Search
Close this search box.

RECENT POSTS

ADVERTISEMENT

‘Inspector Jae’ filed a defamation suit against ‘Lawyer Ratchaphon’ for accusing him of arresting a goat and being jailed for free for more than a year.

Email
Print

Inspector Jae" with lawyer File a defamation suit against a famous lawyer and filed a civil suit asking for damages of 5 million baht, insisting that he was not taken to a safe house. The lawyer revealed that he had found evidence of the opposing lawyer forcing the victim to return his statement. Divide the money in half Police Lieutenant Colonel Thanpeerasit Chulpiphob or "Inspector Jae", Police Superintendent 3, S.S.B.C.N., along with Ms. Achirayan Thanapiraphong. The lawyer came to the Criminal Court on Ratchadaphisek Road to file a lawsuit against lawyer Ratchaphon Sirisakorn for defamation by advertising. In the case of posting a message via a personal Facebook page, slandering "Inspector Jae", the goat was jailed for free for more than a year. Inspector Jae said that the case in which Attorney Ratchaphon Post a message that slanders yourself. The arrest of the defendant in the said case He acted according to the principles of investigation. There was no slander or bullying. His duty is to arrest offe nders and bring them to justice for the court to consider. Even though the said case was dismissed by the Court of First Instance The case was dismissed on grounds of doubt. Later, the Court of Appeal ruled that The defendant's evidence cannot refute the plaintiff's evidence. Therefore, it was judged that the defendant was guilty under the Criminal Code, Section 279, paragraph two, and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment, and because the defendant had a history of criminal offenses. This causes the penalty to be increased by one-third. According to Section 92 of the Criminal Code, this is a prison sentence of 2 years and 8 months, although the Supreme Court later dismissed the case. Still dismissed the case on grounds of doubt. The case was not dismissed because it was found that no offense had been committed. The court ruled that the plaintiff's evidence presented still had reasonable doubt as to whether the defendant had committed an offense or not. Give the benefit of the doubt to the defendant. Inspector J ae stated that the complaint was filed today. It is considered to protect one's own reputation. Because today I work and have a duty to protect the people. If I can't protect myself today How can I protect others? As for the case of Attorney Ratchaphon He accused himself of taking the accused to that safe house. Confirmed is not true Because the arrest team followed the steps and comply with the arrest warrant of the Mukdahan Provincial Court After catching the suspect, he was immediately taken into custody and sent to the investigating officers at Koktum Police Station without being taken to a safe house. or summoned for questioning according to the claims in any way If that's true Why do litigants' lawyers not advise their clients to prosecute them for detention? So I don't know what exactly the post wanted. When the reporter asked: If the parties request mediation, will they compromise or not? Inspector Jae said that he has not yet asked for an answer, but if he wins the case, it will be used in the inves tigation. To benefit the people As for lawyer Achirayan, he said today he will file a criminal complaint. Charged with defamation through advertising and filed a civil lawsuit asking for damages in the amount of 5 million baht. Personally, I am confident in the evidence. In addition, it is also known that Lawyers for the other parties had to persuade the mother of a 5-year-old child at the time to return her statement against the police officers. Hoping to bring 5 million baht to win the case, split in half. The Criminal Court has scheduled a preliminary hearing on the case filed by Inspector Jae on September 2, 2024.-412- Source: Thai News Agency